MICROBIOLOGIA E GESTIONE DELLA SICUREZZA ALIMENTAREModule SICUREZZA E CONTROLLO DEI PRODOTTI ALIMENTARI
Academic Year 2024/2025 - Teacher: Biagio FALLICOExpected Learning Outcomes
The course aims to provide general and applicative knowledge to understand fundamental notions on control, protection and food safety, as well as on food quality requirements
At the end of the course, the student must be able to know the general principles on which Community legislation on food safety is based
In relation to Dublin Descriptors 1 (knowledge and understanding) and 2 (ability to apply knowledge and understanding) the course aims to provide students with the knowledge necessary to understand and deal with issues relating to food safety. In relation to the Dublin Descriptors 3 (autonomy of judgment), 4 (communication skills) and 5 (learning ability) the course aims to enable students to acquire the ability to analyze and understand the labeling of food products and the use of additives.
Required Prerequisites
The teaching consists of 14 hours (2 CFU) of participatory and interactive lessons, with presentation via ppt.
If the teaching is given in mixed or distance learning mode, the necessary changes may be introduced with respect to what was previously stated, in order to respect the program envisaged and reported in the syllabus.
Detailed Course Content
1. "Food safety": fields of application, rules and regulations
3. Tracking and tracing in the agri-food sector
4. Labeling of agri-food products
5. food additivesCourse Planning
Subjects | Text References | |
---|---|---|
1 | Introduction to the concepts of "Food safety", risk and "danger" | |
2 | Food safety and consumer protection: general principles on which Community legislation and key regulations are based, mandatory and voluntary legislation, traceability and traceability of agri-food products | |
3 | The labeling of agri-food products | |
4 | Food additives, definition, classification and risk assessment |
Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
The course includes an ongoing test which will contribute to the final evaluation of the student.
The final verification of learning takes place through an oral interview, where the quality of the contents, the property of the language and the ability to connect the topic with others treated in the program will be evaluated. Passing the intermediate test contributes to the final grade, in a weighted manner.
Unsuitable
Knowledge and understanding of topic: Important shortcomings. Significant inaccuracies
Analysis and synthesis skills: Irrelevant. Frequent generalizations. Inability to synthesise
Use of references: Completely inappropriate
18-20
Subject knowledge and understanding: Threshold level. Obvious imperfections
Analysis and synthesis skills: Barely sufficient skills
Using references: Barely appropriate
21-23
Knowledge and understanding of topic: Routine knowledge Analysis and synthesis skills: Is able to analyze and summarize correctly. Argue logically and coherently
Use of references: Use standard references
24-26
Subject knowledge and understanding: Good knowledge
Analysis and synthesis skills: Good analysis and synthesis skills. Arguments are expressed consistently
Use of references: Use standard references
27-29
Subject knowledge and understanding: Very good knowledge
Analysis and synthesis skills: He has remarkable analytical and synthesis skills
Use of references: He elaborated on the topics
30-30L
Knowledge and understanding of topic: Very good knowledge
Analysis and synthesis skills: He has remarkable analytical and synthesis skills.
Using references: Important insights.
Examples of frequently asked questions and / or exercises
Definition of "food safety"
Difference between real risk and perceived risk
Difference between tracking and tracing
Examples of voluntary legislation